Harnessing Zero-Point Energy

Zero-point energy (ZPE) is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have. Unlike in classical mechanics, quantum systems constantly fluctuate in their lowest energy state as described by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.^[1] Therefore, even at absolute zero, atoms and molecules retain some vibrational motion. Apart from atoms and molecules, the empty space of the vacuum also has these properties. According to quantum field theory, the universe can be thought of not as isolated particles but as continuous fluctuating fields: matter fields, whose quanta are fermions (i.e., leptons and quarks), and force fields, whose quanta are bosons (e.g., photons and gluons). All these fields have zero-point energy.^[2] These fluctuating zero-point fields lead to a kind of reintroduction of an aether in physics^[1][3] since some systems can detect the existence of this energy. However, this aether cannot be thought of as a physical medium if it is to be Lorentz invariant such that there is no contradiction with Einstein’s theory of special relativity.^[1]

The notion of zero-point energy is also important for cosmology and physics currently lacks a full theoretical model for understanding zero-point energy in this context; in particular, the discrepancy between theorized and observed vacuum energy in the universe is a source of major contention.^[4] Physicists Richard Feynman and John Wheeler calculated the zero-point radiation of the vacuum to be an order of magnitude greater than nuclear energy, with a single light bulb containing enough energy to boil all the world’s oceans.^[5] Yet according to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, any such energy would gravitate, and the experimental evidence from the expansion of the universe, dark energy, and the Casimir effect shows any such energy to be exceptionally weak. A popular proposal that attempts to address this issue is to say that the fermion field has negative zero-point energy, while the boson field has positive zero-point energy, and thus these energies somehow cancel each other out.^[6][7] This idea would be true if supersymmetry were an exact symmetry of nature; however, the LHC at CERN has so far found no evidence to support it. Moreover, it is known that if supersymmetry is valid at all, it is at most a broken symmetry, only true at very high energies, and no one has been able to show a theory where zero-point cancellations occur in the low-energy universe we observe today.^[7] This discrepancy is known as the cosmological constant problem and it is one of the greatest unsolved mysteries in physics. Many physicists believe that “the vacuum holds the key to a full understanding of nature”.^[8]

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Sciama (1991), p. 137.
2. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Milonni (1994), p. 35.
3. ^ Davies (2011).
4. ^ See Weinberg (1989) and Peebles & Ratra (2003) for review articles and Shiga (2005), Siegel (2016) for press comment
5. ^ Pilkington (2003).
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b Weinberg (2015), p. 376.
7. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sciama (1991), p. 138.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Davies (1985), p. 104.