Manipulating money is a common problem in every economic system. Bad actors seek to exploit or emulate existing currencies for personal financial gain, whether with fake gold, counterfeit dollar notes, replica coins, or double-spending digital currency.
As new forms of technology and money become publicly available, bad actors are often some of the earliest adopters because the asset is largely untested or unregulated and thus more easily manipulated. Bitcoin is no exception.
Bitcoin’s digital currency network is decentralized—it has no central authority, regulators, or governing bodies to police thieves and hackers. Though traditional security entities don’t monitor the Bitcoin network for double-spending, other network defenses have been implemented to combat attacks that would otherwise threaten the network’s consensus mechanism and ledger of transactions, providing confidence to those who invest in Bitcoin.
What Is the Double-Spending Problem?
The double spending problem is a phenomenon in which a single unit of currency is spent simultaneously more than once. This creates a disparity between the spending record and the amount of that currency available.
Imagine, for example, if someone walks into a clothing store with only $10 and buys a $10 shirt, then buys another $10 shirt with the same $10 already paid to the cashier. While this is difficult to do with physical money—partly because recent transactions and current owners can be easily verified in real-time—there’s more opportunity to do it with digital currency.
Double spending is most commonly associated with Bitcoin because digital information can be manipulated or reproduced more easily by skilled programmers familiar with how the blockchain protocol works. Bitcoin is also a target for thieves to double-spend because Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer medium of exchange that doesn’t pass through any intermediaries or institutions.
How Does Double-Spending Bitcoin Work?
Fundamentally, a Bitcoin double spend consists of a bad actor sending a copy of one transaction to make the copy appear legitimate while retaining the original or erasing the first transaction altogether. This is possible—and dangerous—for Bitcoin or any digital currency because digital information is more easily duplicated. There are a few different ways criminals attempt to double-spend Bitcoin.
Simultaneously Sending the Same Bitcoin Amount Twice (or More)
In this situation, an attacker will simultaneously send the same bitcoin to two (or more) different addresses. This attack exploits the Bitcoin network’s slow 10-minute block time, in which transactions are sent to the network and queued to be confirmed and verified by miners to be added to the blockchain. In sneaking an extra transaction onto the blockchain, thieves can give the illusion that the original bitcoin amount hasn’t been spent or manipulate the existing blockchain and laboriously re-mine blocks with fake transaction histories to support the desired future double spend.
Reverse an already-sent transaction
Another way to attempt a Bitcoin double-spend is by reversing a transaction after receiving the counterparty’s assets or services, thus keeping both the received goods and the sent bitcoin. The attacker sends multiple packets (units of data) to the network to reverse the transactions to give the illusion they never happened.
Blockchain Concerns with Double Spending
Some methods employed by hackers to circumvent the Bitcoin verification process consist of out-computing the blockchain security mechanism or double-spending by sending a fake transaction log to a seller and a different log to the network.
Perhaps the most significant risk for double-spending Bitcoin is a 51% attack. During this network disruption, a user (or users) controls more than 50% of the computing power that maintains the blockchain’s distributed ledger of transactions. Suppose a lousy actor gains majority control of the blockchain. In that case, they can modify the network’s ledger to transfer bitcoin to their digital wallet multiple times as if the original transactions had not yet occurred.
Another concern is the potential double-spending problem on decentralized exchanges as crypto migrates to decentralized exchanges (DEX) and platforms. With no central authority or intermediary, the growth and adoption of DEXs will depend on their security and proven ability to prevent double-spending.
Despite various attempts to successfully double-spend Bitcoin, most bitcoin thefts have resulted not from double-counting or double-spend attacks but from users not correctly securing their bitcoin.
How Does Bitcoin Prevent Double Spending?
Bitcoin’s network prevents double-spending by combining complementary security features of the blockchain network and its decentralized network of miners to verify transactions before they are added to the blockchain. Here’s an example of that security in action:
Person A and B go to a store with only one collective BTC. Person A buys a TV costing exactly 1 BTC. Person B buys a motorcycle that also costs exactly one BTC.
Both transactions go into a pool of unconfirmed transactions. Still, only the first transaction gets confirmations (blocks containing transactions from preceding blocks and new transactions) and is verified by miners in the next block.
The second transaction gets pulled from the network because it didn’t get enough confirmations after the miners determined it was invalid.
Security measure 1: Whichever transaction gets the maximum number of network confirmations (typically a minimum of six) will be included in the blockchain, while others are discarded
Security measure 2: Once confirmations and transactions are put on the blockchain, they are time-stamped, rendering them irreversible and impossible to alter
Once a merchant receives the minimum number of block confirmations, they can be sure a transaction was valid and not a double spend.
Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus model is inherently resistant to double-spending because of its block time. Proof-of-work requires miners on the network, or validator nodes, to solve complex algorithms that require a significant amount of computing power, or “hash power.” This process makes duplicating or falsifying the blockchain significantly challenging to execute because the attacker must re-mine every block with the new fraudulent transaction(s) on it.
This process compounds over time, preserving previous transactions while recording new transactions. Reaching consensus through proof-of-work mining provides network accountability by verifying Bitcoin ownership in each transaction and preventing double-counting and other subtle forms of fraud.
While it is technically possible for a group of individuals to initiate a 51% attack on the Bitcoin network, combining mining power and disrupting the network for their benefit, it is unlikely and complicated as it would require collusion by a tremendous amount of miners or a single miner with over 50% of the network’s hash power. Successfully executing a 51% attack has only gotten more complex over time for a few reasons: the difficulty of mining Bitcoin increases with every Bitcoin halving; mining hardware is prohibitively expensive at that scale, and a massive amount of electricity would be required to power such a massive mining operation.
The Takeaway
Double spending on Bitcoin is a concern since it’s a digital currency with no central authority to verify its spending records. This leaves some to question the network’s security and legitimacy of Bitcoin’s network, validators, and monetary supply. However, the network’s distributed ledger of transactions, the blockchain, autonomously records and verifies each transaction’s authenticity and prevents double counting.
Though the blockchain can’t solely prevent double-spending, it is a line of self-defense before an army of decentralized validator nodes solve complex mathematical problems to confirm and verify new transactions are not double-spent before they’re permanently added to the network’s permanent ledger.
Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can be volatile investments, and prices change quickly due to news flow and other factors. Yet the potential for fluctuating price changes compels some people to seek crypto as an investment.
